• 102-102, 22, Samjak-ro, Ojeong-gu, Bucheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, 14501

Battlefield 3 – review from JEDI (Part 1)

It seems to me that the fact is that not all elements of the engine function on old wood, so the work of the video card is made easier and you get better FPS. It’s logical?

Very, very good review… Everything is objective and to the point.

The only thing that is bad is the microphone, but it’s forgivable.

So do more!

you know how, well https://ukcryptocasinos.co.uk/review/aztec-paradise/ you can. I more or less like your reviews. and the voice does not hurt the ear, and you speak clearly. works out well. well, for someone who doesn’t have money for it. and if in your review of the cartoon you also call the mortar a minus, then I will finally respect you ^_^

I know from my own experience (I am a mortarman myself), no one will ever cover a mortar point and because of this there is only one shooter, he is easy to kill. Of course, in a public game asking someone to take some equipment is stupid. But if you’re playing with friends, ask someone (or yourself) to take a mortar and start looking for enemies. In the battle, the maps are very large and variable, so.e. you can almost always bypass the enemy. . Profit! Forward and with a song to the mortar man. If there are large open spaces, then a sniper (or scout, I don’t remember what it’s called) will help. Below they wrote about shelling a point. Have you ever thought that before moving to a point, you need to kill the mortarman/sniper/engineer who is hiding in the corner with an RPG?? It seems like he said everything he wanted. I didn’t even think about the “like in war” argument. 🙂

Dude, you’re great! I completely agree with the opinion! In the game you don’t even have time to get bored before they present us with something new and surprising. Even the “shooting gallery”, when you need to stupidly kill opponents from behind cover, doesn’t have time to get boring before you either need to change your position, or something happens from which you will need to tear off your soft spot in order to save your skin.
Once I almost got depressed in a mission for Miller (tanker), when the tank was already knocked out, the weapons of mass destruction were evacuated and we were told that reinforcements would only arrive in 15 minutes. I started to think that for these 15 minutes I would have to sit stupidly and play at the shooting range with my heavy machine gun. I’ve already managed to make myself more comfortable so that it wouldn’t be so intense, but at that moment everything ends… I KNOW THAT YOU HAVEN’T PLAYED BF3 YET. So stop reading blogs and then shouting that this moment was not interesting and you knew in advance that “this will happen”.

what is imbecility? although it doesn’t matter. I mean it’s a cheat weapon. I saw guys whose score was 30:5 thanks to him, etc.n. It’s not fair when some people sit and prevent others from playing normally. and if you now write nonsense like: “what do you think about war??", then… I don’t even know what I’ll do. nothing, apparently.

What is there to argue for?? If a review is made by a die-hard fan, the likelihood that the review will be objective is “EXTREMELY SMALL”.

Why, when I talked about bugs, didn’t I mention strange optimization?? The mere fact that the game runs better on old drivers than on new ones is saying something.

Usually, during an assault, a mortar is fired at the transmitter area. They set up a charge -> opened fire from mortars -> to hell with it, not discharging a bomb. But where FF is enabled, it’s probably easier.

what is ff? if only one point was fired at, it would be tolerable. but when in the “capture” mode the entire map is shelled, it’s infuriating. well, how come it’s not imbecilic? I think it’s just an embodiment. yes, the shooter is vulnerable, but you still need to get close to him.

well, how come it’s not imbecilic? I think it’s just an embodiment. yes, the shooter is vulnerable, but you still need to get close to him.

답글 남기기

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다.